Archive for April, 2019

Kind

Tuesday, April 16th, 2019

cake-605-450x392Just kind

In a business that is under disruption, sometimes the best decision you can make is to be kind.

At the IPA conference for International Women’s Day one of the key note speakers Pinky Lilani CBE, Founder, Women of the Future, talked about the importance of kindness in modern leadership.  She said that her business had been built on the kindness of others. She’s created the Kindness and Leadership 50 leading lights, and points out that kindness is seldom celebrated.

The phenomenal early success of one icon of British TV represented a prominent example of the power of kindness in popular culture.  Sandy and Noel are mischievously anarchic.  But they are not as kind as Mel and Sue.

Remember this season?  Watching diffident Rahul win Bake Off was a great pleasure,  finally an introvert in the spotlight for success.  It was one of the highlights of archetypal British TV.  Ratings were strong (if not quite BBC level), the bottoms are no longer soggy, but everyone had a lot of fun with Veganism.

One missing ingredient though is the kindness of Mel and Sue, both to each other – after all there’s a genuine relationship there not a manufactured one – and to the candidates.

Sue revealed that she and Mel walked off the set during Bake Off‘s first season because the producers were trying to coax human-interest drama—and the inevitable tears—out of contestants. “We felt uncomfortable with it, and we said ‘We don’t think you’ve got the right presenters,'” Sue told the Telegraph. “I’m proud that we did that, because what we were saying was ‘Let’s try and do this a different way’—and no one ever cried again. Maybe they cry because their soufflé collapsed, but nobody’s crying because someone’s going ‘Does this mean a lot about your grandmother?'” Bringing up dead relatives at stressful times is a time-honored technique for introducing tension into a television show, but it’s no way to treat your family.

Further than that when contestants did cry—out of frustration or disappointment, generally—Mel and Sue would stand near them and use un-airable language so the embarrassing footage couldn’t make it into the final edit. ” Sue was reported as saying: “If we see them crying or something,  Mel and I will go over there and put our coats over them, or swear a lot because we know then that the film won’t be able to be used.”

Kindness is perhaps the polar opposite of traditional patriarchal business values of ruthlessness and power politics.  Just as we wrote in The Glass Wall, success strategies for women at work and businesses that mean business, the toxic masculinity that pervades many organisations excludes all kinds of talented people from developing their full potential at work.  Pinky said:  “With kindness comes a feeling that is not easily forgotten. Think about customer service that has delighted you; think about a boss who inspired you to be where you are today; think about a brand or business you are loyal to because they seem to genuinely care. Kindness enhances the best qualities in people; it disarms a disagreement and it brings about collaborations which you may never have dreamed possible.”

Think about your own career path.  It’s absolutely true that you will never forget the kindness of others.  As Pinky added on IWD you also never forget an unkindness.

Being unkind is often unthinking and casual.  But never to the recipient.

Kindness depends on there being nothing immediately in it for you.   #Payitforward.

Share

Is there any purpose in campaigns with purpose?

Tuesday, April 2nd, 2019

tttThere’s plenty of debate about campaigns with purpose.  Much of it very intelligent and informed.  Should marketers invest in campaigns that go beyond communicating the benefits of the product or service advertised and extend into a wider purpose for society with which the brand wants to associate?

Does purpose pay is often the question.  And it can divide a room.  The cynics will challenge the purpose of the purpose, often alleging that brands are only doing it to make money or to jump on a bandwagon.  The advocates of purpose campaigns will amplify the effects and gently exaggerate the case studies that get it right.  The arguments will rarely focus on the skill of the execution.  The debate may as a consequence end up being about the difference between a great execution that people love versus one that most people ignore, rather than the strategy of purpose itself.

In other words nice strategy, shame about the execution.

Here are two questions to start with.

The very first question that must be asked is about authenticity. Does the brand have any real right to play a role in the territory in question.  And what actually are they doing to help.  I discussed this in my first book, “Tell the truth, honesty is your most powerful marketing tool”.  As the title suggests our theme was authenticity and we described a powerful case study where the cleaning brand Clorox created a range of products that were better for the environment in partnership with the Sierra Club, an organisation dedicated to fighting for the protection of the planet.  From the brand’s perspective the upside was serious third party endorsement.  Sierra Club acted on the basis of pragmatism.  For the environmentalist campaigners the co-creation of Greenworks meant there was a mass market option available to Americans that was better for the planet.  A brand doesn’t need to reformulate to be authentic in terms of wider purpose, but it needs to be able to evidence that it walks the walk as well as talk the talk.  Average consumers these days are smart.  They can and do investigate the ethics of a brand and manufacturer on their phones, and then shout about what they discover.

The second question is does purpose pay?

Purpose does pay.  The most rigorous UK awards scheme in terms of effectiveness is of course the IPA effectiveness awards.  Several papers published in this year’s book demonstrated two ways in which purpose pays.

Purpose motivates employees. 

Having a higher purpose to the communications helps employees feel positive about the day job and creates opportunities for the business to get more from them.

In an environment where many people are dissatisfied with their careers campaigns with purpose are good for business.

They make employees happy.  This can also help with grass roots marketing, as every happy employee is likely to tell their friends and family.  For big businesses who count their employees in the thousands, this has a multiplier effect that could reach millions as those employees who are proud of their company are likely to tell their friends and family and if 30,000 employees tell 10 people each, and if those 10 tell another 10 friends, well, you can do the math.

Purpose boosts brand saliency. 

It’s one way of standing out from a crowd of similar work and therefore driving return on marketing investment.  Where a product is good, but the category is awash with similar images and messages purpose can differentiate the brand.

Why wouldn’t you want a campaign with purpose?  A well-executed campaign makes your employees feel better about working for you, it gets you talked about in the right way and it delivers. The strategy should be simple.  The campaign can be transformational.  The execution needs above all to be authentic or it will fail.

Share